|
|
Stefan Töpfer
CEO & Chairman of WinWeb Email Me |
|
I'm passionate about very small business, it's positive impact on personal lives and for local communities. Reducing small business failure is my aim and that of WinWeb's services. |
|
Archive for the 'Sales' CategorySaaS for Very Small Businesses - Show Me the MoneyBy Zoli Erdos on May 31, 2006Recently, in SME / SMB Have Become Obsolete Acronyms I discussed how now, that business software and services have become affordably available to small businesses, the SME term has become inadequate to describe this market, especially from the software industry's point of view. Simply because the needs of a $100M company, which SAP and Oracle consider a "small" business are not even comparable to a 6-10 person company - traditionally referred to as SOHO, while recently a new term is popping up: VSB - very small business, the absolute "S" part of SMB. Innovators in the software business are increasingly focusing on this segment. The result of this change is that "Enterprise Software" is no longer the luxury of large corporations. This might sound like a shocking statement, since "Enterprise Software" typically means the world of SAP and Oracle, and the traditional heavyweight, expensive, pay-huge-license-fees-upfront, then try-to-implement-forever model that does not work anymore. But there is another definition that is largely being overlooked: With this definition, Enterprise Software has a whole new, largely unpenetrated market to enter: that of small businesses. Such business functionality has traditionally been beyond reach for a typical small business, for two major reasons:
SaaS is the right answer for both, since it allows the SME user to start using the functionality without an upfront investment, does not require implementation, upgrades, maintenance, worrying about backups and security ..etc. Of course several Open Source packages are available completely free, which is a perfect solution for the cost problem, but frankly most of these packages are by geeks for geeks; i.e. you really have to be quite IT-savy to implement, integrate, upgrade them, and as we stated most small businesses simply do not have that type of resource. Stefan, Winweb's Founder and CEO started an excellent mini-series on Saas Benefits detailing a lot of technical, delivery, usage aspects - now I am going to look at the changed economics from the other side, the software vendors' point of view. If SME’s could not in the past afford Enterprise Software, the same held true for the Software Industry: they could not afford SME’s, since there was just no way to profitable reach millions of small businesses. The cost of customer acquisition vs. the very low license fees made it an uneconomical model, whether via direct or channel sales. A common "dirty secret" of the industry is that about 80% of a an enterprise software company's cost is Sales and Marketing. There's a lot of "fat" in that sales process that needs to be cut out. Once again, technology comes to the rescue: the Internet, and largely Search Engine Marketing changes everything. Joe Kraus, Founder of JotSpot and previously Excite sums it up: Another benefit of SEM (search engine marketing) is that while traditional advertising can pick the right demographic groups, it cannot pick the right time, only a fraction of the target audience is in “change mode”, looking for a solution. That’s the beauty of Search Engine Marketing: obviously if you are searching, you have a problem and are looking for a solution, which is half a win from the vendor’s point of view. Small Business Trends published a survey on “Selling to Small Businesses”, which supports the increasing importance of SEM: “A full 73% of vendors attract small business customers through search engine results” Joe has another excellent article worth reading; especially the last two bulletpoints are relevant to our discussion here. What we're seeing is that the SaaS model changes not only the technology and the delivery of software to customers, but the marketing and sales process, too, which is perhaps where most of the excess "fat" can be cut from. Software companies can now directly and affordably reach millions of small customers. The entire marketing, sales, delivery, implementation, support, upgrade process is seamless, highly standardized, conducted via the Net, teleconferencing, Webex-like sharing in new low-cost ways. So how do software companies make money on small businesses? Ziff Davis has the answer: “Products for the long tail and SMB market, where 72 million businesses spend $5k or less each year, are a much easier play” Wow, I don’t know where those numbers come from, but if I were a SME-focused software vendor, I’d certainly like them … there’s a goldmine out there. AMI Partners confirm: U.S. SMBs to Spend $2.2 Billion on Software in 2006 (This article, with minor changes is cross-posted on my personal blog) Tags: Enterprise Software, Sales, Enterprise Sales, Demand Generation, SAP, Oracle, Jotspot, web20enterprise, business model, Open Source, SEM, Search Engine Marketing, SMB, SME, VSB, Small Business, Winweb
4 Comments » | Trackback
| Share This
Selling online - your questions answeredBy Stefan Töpfer on May 16, 2006
Frequently Asked Questions about selling online a) How much does the set up of an online shop cost? b) Take credit card payments for e-commerce with our partner PayPal? c) How can I drive customers to my website? d) Can I compete with the huge number of suppliers already online? e) Is selling online profitable? f) How long does it take to set up my online shop? g) How much control can I have over my own online shop? Checklist for your online shop
Tags: Business Development, Business Start Up, E-Commerce, Exporting, Home Business, Micro Business, Office/IT, PayPal, Online Shop, SaaS, Selfemployed, Small Business, smb, sme, sme-blog, Software as a Service, Web Technology, WinWeb
No Comments » | Trackback
| Share This
TiEcon 2006: From 0 to 60 : Ramp it Up with Low Bucks - Bootstrapping StartupsBy Zoli Erdos on May 14, 2006I spent Friday and Saturday at TiEcon 2006, a Silicon Valley gathering of close to 4000 Entrepreneurs and their "ecosystem". I’m posting some of my notes on my personal blog, and in case I feel it fits the theme of The Small Business Blog, I will repost those notes here. Jeff Clavier’s bootsrapping panel is certainly on of those: Small Business owners at several stages (early, established, already sold) and investors discussed startup issues. (note: I am obviously publishing this, as well as other TiEcon posts after the fact, but have done only very basic editing, and some linking, essentially posting my original live notes) Panelists:
David Hornik: best way to grow a company is without VC money - now that’s something to hear a VC say… Jeff Clavier: Agrees, but sometimes competitors force the entrepreneur to want to accelerate business which in turn leads to a need for VC investment. David adds another case when you need VC investment, citing a payroll company he invested in: in that type of business customers expect a robust infrastructure, not just a program, and building out the infrastructure is capital intensive. Toni: Background: Oddpost, Yahoo, Automattic - this being his 4th startup now, and he’s just recently "switched sides" to True Ventures. Classic bootstrapping worked for him better than VC funding. Too much VC investment can create a "fat model", entrepreneurs may find themselves trying to use VC money to "create a market" where there is none. Oddpost - could not raise money, since everyone thought they were crazy to be a "me-too" on the crowded email market. They got some corporate customers (licencing deals) , eventually took VC money, but ended up not touching it, since Yahoo acquired them 4 months after the funding. At Automattic they raised intentionally little, could have raised more, but does not favor that model. Organic growth, go find customers, start revenue flow works better. Jeff: Automattic is going up against well-funded blogging companies, why is the "lean model" better?
Jeff: Often the original Founder is an engineer who needs a business savvy partner, or at least advisor, how do you get started in finding the right business guy?
After the warmup / introductory questions Jeff quickly switched to taking questions from the audience. Question on picking the right business, focus on one out of several options:
Jeff, as moderator demonstrates the importance of focus when he forces the next questioner to pick only one of two questions he wanted to ask. After all, that’s what entrepreneurs have to do, too.
Question: When do you give up pursuing a dead business?
Question: Specifically to Tim and Fred. How did you get initial traction once you have the product?
Question: Entrepreneur ended up "in the tent" in 2002 starting again now. Trying to release little bits of software to get customer feedback instead of writing plans. Is that a good approach? Tony: Just be careful that the core is polished enough to put in front of people without turning them off. David: Don’t ask me as a VC what to do.. If your VC knows more about your business than you do, than one of you is an idiot. Fred: Switching cost is huge, don’t easily jump to the next more attractive idea. Question: Inventor of ready-to-launch web application to save marriages. (huge audience laughter, apparently the entrepreneur crowd is in need of being saved…. Hey, if I am not married, what can you do for me?) Finalist of Berkeley Business Plan Competition.. He just needs a VP Marketing to launch, but listening here made him realise he should be hunting for a CEO (Wow!). David: You don’t want my money NOW, get it out, launch, create buzz, displayt ads - you will get called by VC’s. Toni: You don’t need a VP Marketing to launch a product. You will need one later to take it above $10M. Question on chances of a little startup vs. established players. Kanwal Uses Cisco as example: they won’t pay attention until you’re large, then buy you. Tim: Truveo: big guys wanted to build better video search, but they couldn’t, so they bought us. Now that I am part of a big com I understand why. (Audience laughter…. someone on the panel remarks Tim probably missed AOL’s PR training Question: Legal issues., when to involve lawyers. David: Cites strory of a great business, raised big interest in the Valley. Later it turned out the Founder built the products on his employer’s computer and time - BAAAAD. Advice: get lawywers involved early - try to find ones who are excited about the business and pre-fund their contribution until you can pay later. Tim: Strongly disagree, lawyers are a pain in the ass, put it off as long as you can. I don’t remember the context but two notable quotes from Fred: "The only thing you want to do is to separate people from their money." "Nothing will focus your mind razor sharp better than losing money, especially your own" Tags: tiecon, tiecon2006, conference, entrepreneurship, technology, innovation, venturecapital, vcfunding, bootstrapping, startups, angelinvestment, marketing, forum, paneldiscussion, smallbusiness, smb, sme, zoliblog .
No Comments » | Trackback
| Share This
Let’s talk business, ….SMALL BUSINESS.By Stefan Töpfer on Apr 26, 2006Welcome to our new small business blog. We hope you will enjoy our rambling & ranting on the subject of small business. On this blog we will concentrate on providing an inside to our thinking with respect to self-employment, home businesses and small businesses, the so called micro and small businesses. Some of the areas will include:
Let us know what you think and let’s talk business, ……SMALL BUSINESS.
Accounting, Business Development, Business Start Up, CPAs, Data Security, E-Commerce, Exporting, Finance, IT, On-demand, Open Source Software, Outsourcing, PR, SaaS, Sales, sme-blog, Software as a Service, Virtual Assitants, Web Technology, WinWeb
No Comments » | Trackback
| Share This
|