by Stefan Töpfer on Jun 08, 2006
Deborah Brown posted on BizInformer a post titled: “Burning Bridges“. She is of the opinion that a vendor overstepped the mark, when he replied to a bulk-email from a client and wanted to get a 12 month overdue invoice paid.
It is not a nice thing to happen to you, when someone publicly asks to get paid. But being owed money for 12 month is certainly a justification to ask to get paid anyway possible. After 12 month the lawyer should be dealing with this, in which case it would also be in the public domain.
I have to disagree with Deborah on this, businesses need to get paid, they are not banks for clients. I think it is the client who has burned the bridge. If this vendor is still working with this client I think he deserves the situation he is in. It may also indicate to other vendors that there may be a problem, with this client.
Cash flow is king for business, am I wrong?
Tags: Business Development, Business Mentoring, Business Start Up, Cash-Flow, Client Relations, Home Business, Micro Business, Selfemployed, Small Business, smb, sme, SOHO, Very Small Business, VSB
This entry was posted
on Thursday, June 8th, 2006 at 1:56 pm and is filed under Development.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

|
Trackback
|
Share This
Said on June 9th, 2006 at 2:58 am
Hi Stefan,
Well, I agree that the bill should have been paid earlier and they should not be banks for clients.
Of course, the vendor could have done something to bring it to a head earlier, no?
Nice blog.
Anita
Said on June 9th, 2006 at 8:54 am
Anita,
Thank you for your comment. I feel very strongly about this, everyone in business has had clients who have not paid for a long time. This has terrible consequences for business, and for very small business even more so.
Stefan